glass house philosopher / notebook 1
Wednesday, 16th January 2002
Brenda Almond, President of the Philosophical Society of England
Michael Bavidge, Chairman
Martin Gough, Examiner
Martin Cohen, Editor of The Philosopher
I am writing this because Martin Gough asked me for guidelines for examining the Fellowship Diploma. But I also wanted to address Brenda Almond's concern about the title, 'Fellowship'.
I re-started the Fellowship program in order to be able to offer something to Pathways mentors. These are philosophy graduates who are looking to produce work of the kind of quality one might expect from a student in the first year of a graduate philosophy program. Some of the mentors have in fact expressed interest in applying for PhD programs, but this is not our primary interest.
Pathways mentors are not paid. This may seem rather strange. Who would be so altruistic? The answer is that the experience of mentoring students and being supervised (by me) on their work towards the Fellowship is considered sufficient reward in itself.
Pathways mentors are required to demonstrate their communication skills by making regular contributions to the Ask a Philosopher web site. It is not enough to have qualifications under one's belt.
The majority of Philosophical Society 'Fellows' will therefore be people the Pathways mentors who are making a vital contribution to the functioning of the Society. The title 'Fellow' implies that they have achieved a certain standing within the Society, and seems to me entirely appropriate. As I understand it, a fellow is someone who is recognized as an equal among equals: for example, the fellow of a college.
Here are my suggestions for guidelines for the Fellowship diploma:
1. The work does not have to breathtakingly original, but it should show clearly that the writer is aiming to make their own contribution to the area of debate which they have selected. However, it would be acceptable if the writer reached an aporetic conclusion, along the lines of, 'These are the problems as I see them.'
2. The writer should be aware of other work done in the field which they have selected. It is not necessary, however, to produce a comprehensive list of philosophers whose works are relevant to the topic. A bibliography referring only to works mentioned in the text is acceptable.
3. The work should succeed in arguing its case, but that doesn't mean that it has to be armed against objections at all points. However, the work should be marked down if it showed sloppiness or inattention in overlooking obvious counter-arguments.
There is a trade-off between criteria 1. and 2. The less original the aim of the dissertation, the harder the writer has to work in providing a useful and insightful source text on the topic in question.
I look forward to your comments.
All the best,
In response to the above letter, one of the members of the Philosophical Society expressed the view to me that the term "Fellowship" has "fusty, old fashioned and sexist connotations." I disagreed. Sadly, the individual in question has asked me to remove our correspondence which I had previously posted on this page.
I believe in openness. In my professional life I have never written an e-mail other than confidential letters of recommendation for students applying for grants or places on philosophy programs which I would be embarrassed to see posted in the public arena. But not everyone thinks as I do.
Regarding the fellowship, if the Pathways web sites were not sufficient proof that the 'Philosophical Society of England (Founded in 1913)' is making a determined effort to move into the twenty-first century, then there really would be no hope for us. We'd belong in a museum, along with the last dodo.
...Then I could call myself the "Glass Case Philosopher" and compete for hits with that other, rather more famous philosopher in a glass case (at Senate House, University of London) Jeremy Bentham.
That's not going to happen just yet.
I'm always on the look out for things to change, improve, for new things to do, new things to try. I'll even change a name, if it really is an improvement. In this case? Sorry, no. The name and the thing fit together just fine.
From Philosophy Pathways, Issue 23 13th January 2002:
WELCOME TO THE NEW PATHWAYS MENTORS
Last week six new mentors were added to the list of philosophy graduates who will be taking on the responsibility of guiding the studies of students on the Pathways programs. They will be working towards the Fellowship of the Philosophical Society of England under my supervision.
Their names will be familiar to readers who regularly visit the Ask a Philosopher web site:
ADAM G is an Oxford graduate, now living in the USA, who combines his philosophical research with his study of the piano.
BRIAN TEE is a former student from my evening class for the Workers Educational Association (WEA), now on the PhD program at Sheffield University after gaining his first class honours degree. He is researching the work of philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, "the greatest philosopher of the twentieth century". He recently gave a course of lectures for the WEA on 'The meaning of life and death'.
JOHN BRANDON retired from lecturing in Philosophy and Physiology in 1993. During that time he was involved in getting Philosophy and Logic courses started in schools. His main areas of interest are Philosophy of Mind, Epistemology and Metaphysics.
MAUSHUMI GUHA gained her M.Phil at Cambridge University under the supervision of Jane Heal, and is now researching for her PhD at Jadavpur University, India, as well as holding a full-time lecturing post at the Scottish Church College and lecturing at Jadavpur. Her main area of interest is in the Philosophy of Mind.
SIMON DREW gained his MA in 'Values and the Environment' from Lancaster University, UK in 1995, where he passed with distinction, and now teaches Philosophy to 16/17 year olds at the English College in Prague, Czech Republic. He also teaches Psychology to International Baccalaureate students.
TONY FLOOD first contacted me in October, as a former PhD student living in "a terror-stricken city (New York), wondering what the future holds. Yet in the midst of the most unphilosophical things happening around me, I find myself taking advantage of my enforced idleness to reconnect with my philosophical mentors...Brand Blanshard, Charles Hartshorne and Peter Bertocci."
I am full of hope for what these exceptional people will achieve. A hearty welcome from myself and the other mentors to the Pathways Mentor program!
(c) Geoffrey Klempner 2002
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!