glass house philosopher / notebook 1
Monday, 6th May 2002
From Philosophy Pathways Issue 31, 5th May 2002:II. PATHWAYS: THE BOOK?
Regular readers of my Glass House notebook will know that I
have been looking at the possibility of writing a book based
on the Pathways to Philosophy distance learning program
('Glass House Philosopher' Thursday,18th April, page 138).
As it happens, the title 'Pathways to Philosophy' is
already taken ('Pathways to Philosophy: A Multidisciplinary
Approach' Douglas W. Shrader and Ashok K. Malhotra, Prentice
Hall 1996). Although the Pathways project was launched a
year before the book by Ashok and Malhotra appeared, it
seems that their choice of the same name was just pure
coincidence. At least it forces me to be creative, rather
than go for the easy option.
I will not be doing the Glass House Philosopher for a
while. The notebook provides too easy an escape valve...
Philosophers are known for excessive self-examination, but
I cannot help feeling suspicious of my motives. The
occasion was a letter out of the blue from a publisher
asking if I would be interested in submitting a proposal
for an introduction to philosophy. In response to what I
wrote in the Glass House notebook, one of my colleagues
responded sharply, 'You ARE an introduction to philosophy
and your methods should stay within Pathways and the
Society if it is to be of worth which it is or the
publishers wouldn't want you.'
Which has given me pause.
A student from the U.S. Midwest wrote, 'This town where I
live is obsessed with "getting published." I think there
are as many wannabe writers per capita here as there are in
New York City.'
No, there is nothing I 'want to be'. My attitude could be
called complacent, in the non-egregious sense. I have run
out of ambitions. I am content to be as I am now.
The first chapters for 'Naive Metaphysics' were written in
1988. The first Pathways units were written in 1995. For
want of a better description, one might call it a writer's
'seven year itch'. There is a sense that something is
brewing. Though I vowed to myself I would never get on the
rollercoaster ride again, the taste for it is coming back.
There is also a solid, practical reason. A Pathways book in
local bookstores would be a great advertisement. It is
sometimes difficult for someone caught up in the excitement
of the internet to realize that there is a wide world out
there of people who don't like to spend their spare time in
front of a monitor screen.
(c) Geoffrey Klempner 2002
Go to the current issue of Philosophy Pathways.
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!