glass house philosopher / notebook 2
Monday, 4th December 2006
This morning, two new Fellows were welcomed into the International Society for Philosophers. For over two months, I had waited anxiously for the reports from the Board of the ISFP. It was a great relief when the deadline finally passed last Friday. As well as notifying the two successful candidates, I followed the standard practice of circulating all the submitted reports to all the members of the Board. The reports were also shown to the candidates. Nothing is done in secret. The members of the Board are very happy with this arrangement.
Samuel Michaelides originally joined the Pathways Philosophy of Mind program, then encouraged by his mentor Rachel Browne, switched to an MA at the University of Reading. Sam submitted his MA dissertation Mary and the Philosophical Goose Chase which looks at physicalism and Frank Jackson's notorious 'knowledge argument'.
Mike Finch studied Philosophy at Oxford for a year in 1966/7 (his tutor was Paul Grice), and later got a BSc in Physics from Exeter, then getting his doctorate from Sussex for Maths and Theoretical Physics. Alongside his interest in academic philosophy, Mike has been a meditation practitioner for nearly four decades. The title of Mike's Fellowship dissertation is A Metaphysics of Distinction, Performance and Practice.
This brings the number of ISFP Fellows to a respectable four. I would like to see more, but obviously not many people want to put their heads on the chopping block. It takes some courage. To date, three Fellowship submissions have failed. The candidates did not resubmit.
Back in 2001, the Fellowship was one of the bones of contention which finally split the Philosophical Society of England and led to the formation of the ISFP. I found myself in the peculiar position of defending the Fellowship against the charge that the term 'fellow', in the words of one PSOE Council member, had 'fusty, old fashioned and sexist connotations'. Another Council member argued that we were in danger of being open to the criticism of touting the ISFP Fellowship as something on par with Fellowship of All Souls, or Fellowship of the Royal Society!
Thankfully, the common sense of Pathways student and contributor Katharine Hunt came to the rescue, just in the nick of time. In her Philosophy Pathways article Katharine began by quoting the philosopher and artist William Morris: 'Fellowship is life, and lack of fellowship is death.' She went on:
Fusty? Old-fashioned? Sexist? I don't see 'fellowship' as sexist. If you were going to use the word 'brotherhood', I suppose there would be bound to be some objection. But I would understand 'fellowship' as referring to some kind of relationship to my fellow humans. It's true that the word 'fellow' is sometimes used to mean 'man', but it has many other uses.
'Fusty', in this context, is the same as 'old-fashioned', only a bit more derogatory. So is 'fellowship' an old-fashioned idea? Yes! I think it is but only in the sense that virtue and honour and truth and justice also seem to have become rather old-fashioned.
Fellowship is closely related to that other somewhat discredited form of relationship friendship. The current tendency is to believe that all close and loving personal relationships must be sexual. This tendency is illustrated in novels, films, magazines, TV, biographies of famous people, and filters down into the way people deal with and talk about their own personal relationships...
Fellowship is perhaps not as close a relationship as that of loving-friendship; but consequently it is possible to have fellowship with a larger number of people. We could see it as a combination of friendship, and the sense of belonging to a group working together for a common purpose. There is a sense of mutual support, sympathy and understanding; the comfort of meeting with like minds in a congenial atmosphere, to work together for a common aim. In this individualistic age this is indeed an old-fashioned notion; but it is an admirable one, and I hope that Pathways can revive it.
According to the philosopher John Macmurray, whose 195354 Gifford Lectures were published as The Self as Agent and Persons in Relation (Faber 1957, 1961), fellowship is something that we celebrate. Macmurray writes about fellowship primarily in a religious context, the 'celebration' of our consciousness of community in ceremony and song. The emphasis, however, is not on religion as organized worship of some higher being but rather on the bonds that hold human beings together. 'All meaningful knowledge is for the sake of action, and all meaningful action is for the sake of friendship.'
But now, Macmurray reminds us, we must recognize, the 'negative within this positive':
The continuous possibility that hostility and enmity may break out between members of the community and destroy the fellowship is inseparable from any consciousness of it. For community is matter of intention and therefore problematical. What is celebrated is not a fact, but an achievement; and the community has to be maintained in the future. Moreover, the community so far achieved is imperfect, and contains not merely the possibility but also the evidences of failure (Persons in Relation p.163).
While we celebrate every success of our fellowship, we remain conscious of the permanent possibility of failure. It could be argued that schisms and splits are an inevitable part of the process, but then to exactly the same extent so are alliances and mergers. We strive for unity in a plural world. That is not self-contradiction or self-defeating intention but simply part of what it is to be human.
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!