glass house philosopher / notebook 2
Monday, 27th September 2004
8.41 am Don't panic. You can do it.
On my desk today:
Issue 92 of Philosophy Pathways and Issue 12 of Philosophy for Business. Six articles to edit, two layouts, two Editor's notes, two sets of address lists to update.
The latest Questions and Answers for Ask a Philosopher. This is over a week late. More questions coming in than ever before.
Other tasks, mostly unanswered emails. Each task is a little scarlet icon on my computer desktop. Today, there are 29 icons, completely filling the screen. I definitely know I'm not going to get through all of these.
This notebook page. Well, at least that's one task sorted. Better get to work!
(In case you were wondering, I'm not a workaholic. I can quit at any time I like. Really!)
8.57 am I'm starting with something I know I'm going to enjoy. An article by Lawrence J.C. Baron for Philosophy Pathways entitled 'A Lover's Dilemma'.
9.20 am Hmm. This is a bit of a surprise. The dilemma in question turns out to be more of a logical dilemma than a practical dilemma, a threatened logical incoherence within the concept of love itself. I shouldn't have been surprised. Baron did his BA Philosophy degree at London University, where I did my BA, so I am quite familiar with this style of 'analytical' philosophy.
OK, what's next? Something short and sweet: D.R. Khashaba asks the question, 'Was Keats a Fool?' Here are the famous lines:"Beauty is truth, truth beauty," that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.
Khashaba always brings a fresh perspective to familiar philosophical themes. This will be interesting.
9.41 am A truly beautiful piece, succinctly argued: "my interpretation... of this insight is that the self-evidence of the intelligible form engendered by the mind and to be found nowhere but in the mind is the hallmark of philosophical truth: that self-evidence is of an essentially aesthetic nature." The 'intelligible form' in question is the Platonic form: for example, the form of Beauty. But the point is equally valid for other Platonic forms, like Justice, or the form of the Triangle. The highest form of truth is the truth that you see.
Next on the menu: another article from Professor Ruel F. Pepa from Trinity College, Quezon City, Philippines. 'An Intimate Reflection (on the sensitivity and sensibility of human life... hopefully towards a transformative philosophizing)'. The article starts off with quotes from Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and Nietzsche. Terrific!
10.01 am Ruel Pepa: "Philosophy brings us to more exciting terrains of life where the wind of freedom blows incessantly, and carries us to new discoveries in uncharted milieus-unstructured, rustic, pregnant with mysteries; open to be molded by the power of the subjective mind, challenging the human spirit, defiant of the dictates of meta-narratives imposed by arrogant systematizers coming from the alien territories of science and mathematics." Wow! So is this how the battle lines are drawn, between 'becoming subjective' and the objective stance of the practitioner of philosophical analysis? What about the philosophers like myself, who are quite happy to get along with a foot on both camps?
In this issue of the newsletter I am also including a short announcement by Ken Knisely of No Dogs or Philosophers Allowed. The First Annual Philosophy Video Festival will be held in December in Boston at the Eastern Meeting of the American Philosophical Association. The festival features "a contest to find the most profound philosophical videos produced by high school and college students this year. This years theme is Civil Liberties and National Security. Entries must be between one second and four minutes in length." More details from http://www.nodogs.org/PhilVidFest.html or e-mail PhilVidFest@nodogs.org.
I'm trying to think how one would make a one second video. That would be really impressive if you could pull that off.
10.15 am I had to wake myself up. I'd started day-dreaming about my new career as a philosophical video producer. I'm going to read the Philosophy for Business articles, then make myself a coffee.
... No, on second thoughts, I'll have that coffee now.
June says this isn't good for me. I just pour hot water on a couple of teaspoonfuls of ground coffee in a mug and let the grounds settle. But I haven't got the patience to mess around with jugs and things, or wait for the drip, drip, drip of the filter machine.
11.02 First article for Philosophy for Business is by Pathways student Ovidiu Gherghe, on 'Pragmatic Leadership: A Candidate for Supervision and Management Approach'. What this boils down to is that the pragmatic manager is one who is not hung up on applying any particular theory; one who continually learns from the past and adapts his/ her approach accordingly; who sees no value in being consistent at all costs; who is capable of taking in the the management situation as a whole, rather than allowing oneself to be obsessed with some particular aspect. Sensible advice.
Next, an article by Angela Richards, 'Germanising Globalisation Assessing the impact of globalisation on German business'. This is going to take me a while.
11.43 am Whew!
It hadn't occurred to me before that the long social partnership between German business and the German work force preserved by comprehensive legislation owes its survival to the policy of the Allies after the defeat of Germany in 1945. Workers who were sufficiently contented in their lot would be less tempted to embrace Communism. In the face of globalisation and the demands of a freer labour market, Germany is looking for a middle way, which preserves as much as possible of the structures which in the past guaranteed a loyal and committed work force. Much for the philosopher to think about here.
Last but not least, my colleague Rachel Browne's article. This looks fascinating.
12.10 pm I can't believe this. Scientific researchers claim to have identified a hormone whose increase or decrease directly affects a person's tendency towards ethical behaviour! Rachel Browne cleverly contrasts this recent research with the company Johnson&Johnson who have a long established 'credo', a written ethical code. The third, more philosophical alternative which Rachel advocates, is that employees and managers alike should learn to do the psychological work of developing good ethical relations, without the benefit of an external prop.
Six articles done. Now comes the part where I put it all together, compile the address lists and send out the two newsletters. I've never timed myself doing this before. It will be interesting to see how long it takes.
12.49 pm Philosophy Pathways is all set up and ready to go.
1.14 pm Philosophy for Business is done and dusted. Now all I have to do is update the address lists, and email them to the University of Sheffield list server. Then send out the newsletters. This is where I have to be careful. On one occasion not so long ago, I accidentally sent out a list of over a thousand email addresses of subscribers to the recipients of Philosophy Pathways. (Some still haven't forgiven me for that.)
I almost forgot. Before I can compile the email lists, first I have to welcome the latest new members of the International Society for Philosophers. Otherwise the new members' email addresses will be missed out. (Don't rush, just keep your cool.)
1.35 pm Done the lists. 1195 for Philosophy Pathways, 489 for Philosophy for Business. I'm not going to send the newsletters out yet. I'll have my lunch first, then check them over one more time.
2.47 pm After lunch, I remembered I had to forward a Pathways certificate to Tony Bellotti, Secretary of the International Society for Philosophers for David who recently completed his Pathways Metaphysics program. When I came back, my SETI@home screensaver (searching for signs of alien intelligence) had crashed the computer. Maybe it found something?! Two restarts later, I still haven't looked over the two newsletters. I'll send the address lists first, to give the list server time to process the updates.
3.10 pm When I looked over the newsletters I discovered quite a few errors. There are always more I hope there aren't any embarrassing ones.
Next task, Ask a Philosopher. Last week, I inadvertently deleted half of the feedback log which records submitted questions, so I am going to have to reconstruct it from the emails.
3.59 pm That's what you call word processing on an industrial scale. There are 266 questions in all. The large number is partly due to the fact that Ask a Philosopher is over a week late. But there have also been more questions coming in. A lot of these have been asked before. Some people submit the same question half a dozen times. Why on earth do they do that? And then there are the questions that you just can't imagine how anyone thought that they were for a philosophers (unless you think that philosophers know absolutely everything). Now for the big cull.
4.24 pm I'm half way through and down to 169 questions. I'm trying to be as fair as I can. But some of these are truly awful: "Why did Andy join a gang? With a partner, discuss the reasons and whether or not they make sense to you." Who is Andy?? This one really takes the biscuit: "Are Jaffa cakes, cakes or biscuits?" I'm keeping that one in because I like Jaffa cakes.
4.42 pm Final count 112. I'm really unhappy with the way this is going. Finally the news is out and Ask a Philosopher is being deluged. The few good, interesting questions are getting lost amongst the dross.
I still have the Answers page to do. There are just 35 of these, in the Answers mailbox. But if I continue with now, I won't have time to answer any of my emails.
5.26 pm I'm backing up my files onto my Powerbook. Then I'm off home.
10.26 pm In the kitchen with my Powerbook, after spaghetti bolognese (it was my turn to cook) and a fascinating TV program about the Black Death. I feel thoroughly refreshed.
Well, ask a philosopher. It had to end some time. I won't say the feature is going down hill but it's poised on the brink. Like counterfeit coins, the bad questions are driving out the good. The team are getting despondent. They need more of a challenge. I could finish today, but that would mean ending on Questions and Answers pages number 13. Far better to finish with an even dozen. No?
I can't believe that I am seriously considering this. Ask a Philosopher was launched in 1999. It has come a long way since then. But it has ceased going forward. It is time.
Maybe it was that TV program.
Maybe it's sheer boredom. Well, yes, I am bored with this. Sorry to be so blunt. Recently, I've been getting more ruthless. Either I'm in charge of Pathways or Pathways is in charge of me. Master or slave: which is it to be?
I said I could quit any time I liked: you didn't believe me.
Tomorrow... is a brand new day.
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!