glass house philosopher / notebook 2
Tuesday, 2nd November 2004
Whew! That was a relief...
My anxiety about writing a notebook page was mounting up, and I couldn't figure out why. Of course, the problem is that I've been posting these pages on the front page of the Pathways web site. So instead of just writing whatever comes to mind, I had to think twice. The question, 'Will this look good the Pathways page?' is impossible to avoid. (Or, even worse, 'How many enrolments will this bring in?' Ugh!)
Well, today there's something much better in the Pathways extracts slot, part of a superb essay by Judith Butler on Jacques Derrida, which was distributed to the Philosop e-mail list shortly after Derrida's death, 'with the request from the original sender that it be widely distributed'. Before publishing the complete piece in Philosophy Pathways, I did a quick check on Google for 'Judith Butler', and it turns out that Butler is Professor of Rhetoric and English Literature at the University of Berkeley, California, has written a string of books, mainly to do with gender issues. It also turns out that her essay has been snapped up by the London Review of Books where it is due to appear (in the printed version) on 4th November.
So you could say that the London Review of Books has been pipped at the post. Issue 94 of Philosophy Pathways was published yesterday, and sent out to over 1200 addresses.
'Ya boo sucks!' as they say in Yorkshire.
...That wasn't what I was going to write about, anyway. Just needed to get that off my chest.
I wanted to write about a little exchange I had with Marianne Talbot, Director of Studies for Philosophy at Oxford University Dept of Continuing Education. I sent Marianne a CD-ROM with all 90 units of the Six Pathways Programs which she said she would look at. In my email, I wrote:You may find that these are a bit tougher than your courses. Even the Introduction to Philosophy gets into quite deep water in places. My aim was to write something that would hold the interest of philosophy graduates as well as beginners in philosophy not an easy brief!
Marianne replied:I shall give whatever feedback I can. Your brief certainly sounds difficult (indeed virtually impossible to me!).
That got me thinking. Maybe she's right. Perhaps I have been too distracted by my dialogues with my more knowledgeable students to notice how well the beginners are really faring. I once advertised Pathways as 'Philosophy for Intelligent People'. Yes, you can start any of these programs without any prior knowledge of philosophy or its history, but you have to be prepared to work, to use every inch of your intellectual resources.
But is that reply good enough?
There's a tried and tested method which a philosopher might all-too easily overlook which is to do some empirical research. Ask people. Do a questionnaire. And so, for the first time in the nine years that Pathways has been running, all Pathways students, past and present, will be receiving a questionnaire asking about every aspect of their learning experience. Pathways student Ute Sommer is designing the questions, and to avoid the accusation of doctoring the evidence will be receiving all the completed questionnaires and collating the results.
That promises to be an eye-opener.
...Meanwhile, wasn't I supposed to be writing a book? 60 day course in thinking. Here are the chapters (or 'lessons'), to date:
Lesson one Creating a space (page 30).
Lesson two Mentors, teachers and gurus (page 31).
Lesson three Philosophy is an art (page 32).
Lesson four Radical doubt (page 33).
Lesson five The depth of philosophy (page 34).
Can you see where this is going? If you can, please tell me because I can't. (Let's see what happens after lesson five... Alexander's Emporium? are you kidding??! That episode is just another example of how this notebook is all over the place. Why do I keep allowing myself to get so distracted?)
I remember now... I was going to go over twenty years of notes. Couldn't face the nausea. Then I was going to edit the 2000 plus letters I have written to my Pathways students. That would take a year or more: no way. So now I'm back with my 60 day course in thinking. (My sister Julia, God bless her, said, 'You'd better reduce it to 30 days if you want the book to sell.')
Yeah, right. Why not 15 days? Or, better still, 5 days?? Hell, I've written the book already! Go find me a publisher!
There's a good idea buried here somewhere, if only I can keep my mind on it and not get distracted again. This is going to be the one and only book the absolute beginner needs to navigate safely through a Pathways program. Makes sense? doesn't it?
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!