glass house philosopher / notebook 2
Sunday, 29th February 2004
I'm thinking ahead to next weekend, when I will be sending out issue 5 of the Pathways Philosophy for Business newsletter. Some time between then and now I will be writing my contribution, "What They Didn't Teach Me at Oxford University". Strange how one can be so certain of the future. But I have made a start, and I am sure I will continue.
I am going to talk later about the book that inspired me, Mark McCormack's What They Don't Teach You At Harvard Business School. I also want to say something about my father, Paul Klempner who experienced the best and the worst of the business world, and taught me things you can never learn in a book. That's also for later.
Today I am taking a nostalgic trip back to Oxford.
I have just done a quick search through my first notebook and was surprised by the number of references to Oxford. Of course, I shouldn't have been. My time there as a graduate student has had such a profound impact on my life. Some of my deepest philosophical convictions were formed there. Yet I left Oxford without any sense that philosophers have a role to play in the world. As an outsider on the fringes of the academic scene, going my own way and rarely attending seminars or lectures, I was surprisingly uncritical of the central tenet of the academic philosopher's faith: that Philosophy exists "purely for its own sake".
I swallowed the faith hook, line and sinker. By the time I left Oxford, I was prepared get this! to live the rest of my life relying on the British social security system (it couldn't happen now, after Thatcher), living frugally and writing my Collected Works. It took a dose of real life Sheffield in the 80's, the steel industry collapsing and mile long dole queues to bring me to my senses at last.
Ah! I've remembered something:
I've always maintained that a philosophy degree is a highly useful qualification. Philosophers are better at analysing and solving problems. They are more articulate, better communicators than graduates of other disciplines. But to someone choosing a subject for their degree, that is a side issue. Philosophy has got to be something you need to do, or you shouldn't be doing it at all. The full and final justification of philosophy the full and final justification for there being university departments of philosophy is that philosophy is worth doing for its own sake. Everyone who discovers the need for philosophy knows that this is true.
Notebook I, 20th September 1999
Absolutely, I couldn't agree with that more. The point is that there is more to the vocation of the philosopher than simply love of the subject. Plato's Philosopher in the Republic escapes the Cave of illusions, to experience the brilliant Sun, the Good, the Ultimate Reality, but then goes back to the cave to rescue the other poor souls who got left behind.
Then he does what? teach them metaphysics? are you kidding??
That was not why Socrates went to the market place, why he sought to engage anyone and everyone in dialogue, challenging their prejudices and forcing them to think about their lives.
The Philosopher teaches the physician to be a good physician, the statesman to be a good statesman, the stonemason to be a good stonemason, the motorcycle mechanic to be a good motorcycle mechanic... the businessman to be a good business man.
That is home base. That is where I start.
So the Business newsletter had to be. Not just because of that, of course:
I have made no secret of the fact that I regard what I do as a business. Despite the apparent evidence to the contrary, I have discovered that philosophy is what a lot of people want...
Pathways Seven Years On
(Practical Philosophy Issue 6, April 2003)
I have to sell. I have to compete in the marketplace. Socrates never had to do that! That puts me in a better position to give advice no, that's wrong, it puts me in a better position (I shouldn't flatter myself, not that much better, really, but enough) for my advice to be heard.
Back to Oxford. Why do so many academic philosophers dream of going there? As a Senior Fellow of an Oxford College you are set up for life. When I was there, it was possible to get away with offering just one seminar or lecture course a year to meet the minimum requirements of your Fellowship. If you wanted to earn extra money as a lecturer employed by Oxford University (a separate institution from the self-governing Colleges of Oxford University) that was your affair. It's not so surprising, is it, that I dreamt up my plan for a monkish existence on the dole devoted to reading and writing philosophy.
"But wouldn't you take an Oxford Fellowship, Klempner, if you had the choice?" Don't tempt me! It's hypothetical anyway. And it wouldn't be practical. Not with a wife and children to support. Then I would have no choice but to accept employment from the University and end up living a life which I do not envy at all, the life of a university professor, shackled to lecture timetables and faculty meetings...
...No, being a self-employed Sophist suits me just fine.
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!