glass house philosopher / notebook 2
Sunday, 6th February 2005
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:51:15 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ian Marsh
Subject: Re: Pathways
To: Geoffrey Klempner
I have put together some questions for our radio interview below. Please feel free to alter them or add new ones that you may think are relevant. Equally, feel free to ignore any of them.
I'm sure you're busy, so please take as long as you need and either let me know when you have finished or alternatively I will e-mail you to see how it's going.
OCI is the main English-language radio station in South East Spain, which reaches 400,000 listeners.
Q1. What gave you the idea to start Pathways, and how did you go about it?
I've written about this before: Philosophy From a Distance (1997), Can Philosophy be Taught? (1999), Pathways to Philosophy: Seven Years On (2003). A better question to ask is, what was my idea? Back in 1995 when the first postage stamp sized adverts appeared in The Sunday Times and The Guardian offering 'an exciting development in distance learning' I did not have the faintest notion of what Pathways would become.
This is how it started. On a day trip to the South Yorkshire town of Barnsley with my young daughters I spotted an old Charles Atlas course in a second hand shop. That sparked the original idea: a Charles Atlas course for the mind. Back then, I was hardly aware of the internet. I envisaged an old-style correspondence course. I was also charmed by the story of Sophie's World where Sophie receives her philosophy lessons in brown paper envelopes. So I made the decision right at the start that course units would be sent in manageable instalments, rather than have a fat course pack arrive with a thump on your doorstep.
Over the summer of 1995 I drafted and redrafted my course synopsis. There would be six book length programs, each divided up into fifteen units. (One good thing to come out of this was my short piece, Writing a Philosophy Essay which still stands up well today.) Before writing a single unit, I sent the synopsis round to every academic philosopher in the United Kingdom I can't remember the number of letters, but it was in the hundreds. I wanted to test the water, and also get some positive comments which I could use for my publicity materials. Luckily, I did receive some very encouraging responses. If I hadn't, the project would have died there and then. Then I put the finishing touches to my course pack and wrote the first unit from each program, before publishing my first newspaper ads. I figured that enrolments would be relatively slow at first, so that would have enough time to write the remainder of the units. It was a close shave, but I managed to write all six programs in the first two years.
Then, looking around for something else to do, I launched the Pathways web site. That was in 1997. After that, whenever I had another idea, I just made another web site. At the last count, there were about nine or ten, including this one.
Q2. Why did you decide to start Pathways? (Maybe as above)
My book Naive Metaphysics had appeared the previous year. The effort of writing the book had left me drained. I'd given up all my university teaching work to concentrate on writing. Now I faced the prospect of going back to what I did before I just didn't have the taste for it. I gave one final year undergraduate Metaphysics course based on my book for Sheffield University (which later became Program F. The Ultimate Nature of Things). I didn't have a clue what to do next.
Back in the days of my Oxford graduate studies in the late 70's I'd once jokingly remarked to my supervisor John McDowell that I would 'really only be happy with my own school of philosophy'. Surprisingly, he'd agreed with me. Maybe it wasn't so surprising, as McDowell knew my distaste for university academic philosophy. I remembered that incident when I saw the Charles Atlas course.
Q3. What's new in Pathways? Any offers or new programmes?
There's always something new. The most recent addition to the range of Pathways programs is our support for the University of London Diploma and BA via distance learning. Pathways is one of just two institutions listed in the University of London External Programme prospectus as a provider of tuition for the Philosophy Diploma and BA.The Pathways CD-ROM is the latest thing: all the Pathways web sites on a single CD. The idea has been a great success, especially for people with laptops because it means you can take Pathways with you everywhere without having to be connected to the internet.
Our electronic journal Philosophy for Business, the sister publication to Philosophy Pathways has been going for just over a year and is making a significant impact on the world of business ethics. I was surprised to find myself mentioned in a recent Wikipedia article, Philosophy of Business where I'm listed alongside the world famous business guru Peter Drucker as a prominent 'philosopher of business'. This has been a completely new departure for me and I'm sure that exciting things will happen in the future.
Q4. Is it possible for people living in Spain to sign up to Pathways and still get support throughout the project?
Q5. Do you think philosophy is as influential or as relevant today, as it was a few hundred years ago?
Three hundred years ago, 'Philosophy' still meant all the sciences, and the researchers and writers of the day were fully knowledgeable about the history of philosophy. Philosophers like Descartes and Leibniz made major contributions to mathematics and physics. You could not consider yourself well educated if you didn't know your Plato and your Aristotle. Today, academic philosophy is seen as just another specialism. But actually I think that philosophy is more relevant today than it has ever been, because we can no longer pretend that the problems that we face, as a civilization, are merely technological, or even socio-political. They are problems of values. Nietzsche was the first to see this. He predicted the decline of religion, the 'death of god'. Now, each of us, individually, faces the problem of What to do? which is not about, 'What does the Bible or Koran say?', or, 'What does my country or society require of me?' It's about justifying our very existence. Without the dimension of philosophy, we're lost. We're nothing. We have no right to be. And it's not only a question we face as individuals. Philosophers are the conscience of society, just as it was for Socrates. The only difference is that today, with the falling away of traditional beliefs, philosophy is the last defence which stands between a society where human values are still important, and rampant materialism.
Q6. Do you think it should be touched on more on in school? I feel I would have benefited knowing more about philosophy earlier.
I had a similar experience to yours. One day in a physics class, our teacher unexpectedly came out with the question, 'Have you ever thought about life with a capital 'L'? We didn't know what to say. What has life got to do with Boyle's Law? That was just about the only time philosophy ever got mentioned during my time at school. I went on to study Chemistry, dropped out, then finally came upon philosophy more or less by luck. So, yes, I would like to see philosophy taught in school. But not the way it is done on the continent, where the emphasis seems to be on learning what this or that philosopher said, rather than grappling with the deep questions. And, yes, I do think that youngsters are fully capable of thinking about the deep questions. Plato thought that the study of philosophy should be restricted to people over 50! My experience is different. One of my best ever Pathways students was a fifteen year old Glasgow schoolboy on the Pathways Philosophy of MInd program.
Q7. What benefit would an understanding of philosophy give to someone who had never even considered it an interest let alone studying it? Can people gain from just a little understanding of philosophy?
In Pathways to Philosophy: Seven Years On I wrote, 'You can philosophize for sheer enjoyment. Or because you want to change the world. Or to develop and hone your mental powers. Or out of insatiable, childlike curiosity. Or because your very life depends upon it.' That's my answer to someone who isn't immediately gripped by the need to puzzle out the meaning of life or justify their existence. Grappling with the problems of philosophy can be fun, and often thrilling. Philosophy sharpens your mind. You really do see the benefit from even a little study of philosophy in your ability to 'win friends and influence people'. You become better at formulating a case, thinking clearly, persuading.
Q8. If so, do you think this sort of radio slot is good for getting philosophy a bit more in the main stream?
Q9. Do you need to be a certain type of person to really understand philosophy; is it in part down to personality?
The question really is, are there any personality types which are unsuited to the study of philosophy? I don't think so. Obviously, I'm not thinking of the kind of person who is ignorant and happy to be so. Depending on your personality, or your personal goals, you will be attracted to philosophy for different reasons. That's all. Give me half an hour with any reasonably intelligent person who knows nothing about philosophy and I think I could interest them sufficiently to make them want to know more about the subject.
Q10. A lot of people ask me why I am doing philosophy. Where will it take me? they say. I answer, I am doing it as it makes sense to me and I can't imagine doing anything else. I'm not looking for it to take many anywhere financially or professionally. It gives me a greater understanding of things and it helps me look at things differently. However, for someone who is stuck choosing between something like law and philosophy. What benefits could someone get from a degree in philosophy?
This is a very good question, because both law and philosophy teach you to argue logically and make a case. So what does philosophy give you that law doesn't? In the introduction to his collection of papers, Consequences of Pragmatism, the American academic philosopher Richard Rorty remarks that an increasing number of academic philosophers today think more like lawyers than philosophers. Their main asset, as they see it, is their argumentative skills. The ultimate or perennial questions do not grip them. They are not fighting for a cause. They are more like professional guns for hire. This is a loss, because, as you say, philosophy has the capacity to make sense of things. This is something we all need to do, whether or not we are prepared to consciously admit this to ourselves. There will come a time, I would say to the person unsure about philosophy, when you will need it even if you don't think you need it now.
Q11. What made you become interested in philosophy?
I discovered one day that I had been interested in philosophy without knowing it. I was contacted by an 'Educational Redeployment Service' after I dropped out of my Chemistry BSc and I agreed to an interview. I was given a little pamphlet with a choice of possible subjects and reading lists. Under 'Philosophy' my eye was caught by Lewis Carroll Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. I read the Alice books. Then I went to my local library and took out the Collected Works of Plato.
Q12. I feel it may be harder to be influential as a philosopher these days. How would a group similar to the one I run, made up mainly of philosophy students, be influential in the future? Do philosophers and philosophical discussions need to be approached differently, perhaps relating more to the modern world?
The fundamental challenge is political. By that I mean that philosophers need to organise because as individual philosophers you and I do not have much chance of getting heard. Philosophy has got to become something it is not yet, it has to become a movement. What do we do after we have got organised? How do we become a movement? I'm not quite sure, as yet, but I'm working on it.
Q13. Following on from that. Is there the opportunity for, and will there be any philosophers today or in the future, who may be regarded as highly or be remembered in the same way as some of the past centuries greats?
I believe so. The implication of your question is that, if any philosophers do succeed in making the same impact as Plato or Descartes, it will be because they succeeded in making philosophical thinking a force for real change. I accept that.
Q14. Do the classic questions still matter?
The classic questions are with us still, even though we may have learned to formulate them in different ways. For example, the question of the relation between mind and body, or the problem of truth, or freedom of the will.
Q15. The great thing about the Associate Award is that it is open to all, even those without formal qualifications. Was this a conscious decision?
The Associate Award (and also the Fellowship) has a long history which precedes Pathways by many decades. The awards were originally offered for successful completion of a course of correspondence study by The Philosophical Society of England (see A Philosophical Kindergarten: A History of the Philosophical Society of England) which was founded in 1913 to 'to promote the study of practical philosophy among the general public'.
The most important concept in the way the Associate award is run today is that of the level playing field. Originally, candidates could earn 'credits' towards the Associate based on previous academic success. Today, it doesn't matter whether you are a relative beginner, or have studied for years. After agreeing a study program with your Mentor, you get the chance to write eight essays of 20002500 words, from which you select four for your examination portfolio. Students can take as much time as they like to produce their eight essays. When the portfolio goes before the Board of the International Society for Philosophers the essays are judged purely on their own merit. To make the examination criteria as open as possible, successful submissions for the Associate are posted permanently on the Pathways site in the Pathways Essay Archive.
Q16. You also founded the International Society for Philosophers. What is the main purpose of the organization?
The main purpose of the ISFP is to promote the study of philosophy world-wide, to 'teach the world to philosophize' as I expressed it rather grandly in the ISFP Mission Statement. In practical terms, the ISFP currently oversees the running of the Pathways programs. As I suggested earlier, I would like to see the ISFP become more political. But there is time for that.
Send me an Email
Ask a Philosopher!