| ⇐ 4 | P H I L O S O P H Y from a different side |
Follydiddledah! Exploring the interface between philosophy and art | Philosophy the new rock n' roll The succinct case for philosophy | Possible world machine Science fiction stories on philosophical themes | Brain morsels Stimulate your thinking muscle | Philosophy for intelligent people Links to all the Pathways sites | Philosophy of the body Considerations on plastic and cosmetic surgery | Philosophy of A–Z Eclectic links proving that everything under the sun is a subject for philosophy | ISFP Publishing Submit your manuscript — on any philosophical topic under the sun | Camera dreamer The mind of the photographer in words and images | Wood paths Articles on death, solipsism and time | Questions and answers Latest questions and answers from Ask a Philosopher | Glass house philosopher Geoffrey Klempner's online notebooks [current page]
Inquiries, questions, complaints to klempner@fastmail.net
|
| That is a factor to be taken account of when one considers the widespread disdain for Joad amongst academic philosophers when his career was at its peak. The received opinion was that he was a clever man, but a bad philosopher. His brilliance as a speaker, as witnessed in the Oxford debate, and later on the popular BBC radio and television programs, was what made him in their eyes such a threat to the cause of philosophy. |